Yo Delaware!

by RSmitty on September 1, 2010

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

I’m still here!  To the joy of some and chagrin of others, I am sure.  I am going to start working on angles of Delaware interest and it won’t always be political.  I’ve realized that in little ol’ Delaware, where everyone supposedly knows everyone else, we often times don’t know who is standing next to us or what we are standing next to.  This, of course, is not a paying job or any job for that matter.  It’s second fiddle to my career and family, so I will get you these Delaware nuggets as fast as I can, but it’s something I want to do, because you think you know everyone in Delaware, but do you?

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Weather Lore

by RSmitty on September 1, 2010

I am the resident weather geek and I am proud to admit that!  We just experienced weather history, possibly in advance of even bigger weather history named Earl.  Here is what you may have missed:

… Warmest meteorological Summer on record at Philadelphia…
… Eighth warmest August on record at Philadelphia…
… Fourth most days in a year that reached or exceeded 90 degrees
on record at Philadelphia so far…

Meteorological Summer (june, July and august), 2010 is the warmest
Summer on record with an average temperature of 79.63 degrees. The
previous warmest Summer on record occurred in 1995, when the average
temperature was 78.53 degrees.

Also, August, 2010 is the eighth warmest August on record with an
average temperature of 79.0 degrees. The warmest August on record
occurred in 1980, when the average temperature was 79.9 degrees.

Finally, the temperature this year at Philadelphia has reached or
exceeded 90 degrees on 48 days through August. That makes 2010
the year with the fourth most days that have reached or exceeded 90
degrees so far. The year with the most days that reached or exceeded
90 degrees is 1991, when it occurred on 53 days.

Records date back to 1872.

source: wunderground.com records for Wilmington-area, Sept 1, 2010.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

This letter appeared online at News Journal’s website, delawareonline.com, on August 25th, not sure of the dead-tree date, although it could possibly be today as well. The current location of the letter can be found here.

While I ask you to click the link for the “honor system” and giving the source credit, here is the letter from Wednesday’s online edition of the News Journal:

As a psychologist with a deep interest in the brain, I am increasingly concerned about the nature of our politics and the level of polarization around us. Polarized reactions come from the more primitive regions of our brains, bypassing the higher parts of the brain, especially our big frontal cortex.

Reacting to things with black and white thinking is basically a “no brainer,” requiring no mental sweat. The more we use our brains in this knee-jerk reactive way, the less we use the parts of our brains that only turn on when we do some deeper, more complex thinking.

I fear we are devolving as we become more and more a society that only uses the shouting true about, “love it or leave it” part of our wonderful brains while failing to exercise the mental higher powers that nature has given
The old saying of “use it or lose it” is very our brains. I fear we are dumbing ourselves down.
Jonathan Baylin, Wilmington

This goes right into my complaint that there is no critical thinking or intellectual debate in the heart of the political arena.  It’s all about “gotchas” and premeditated litmus tests.  Facts are denied and anecdotes are rule.  Pragmatists are scorned and lemmings are heros.  Sad and pathetic, yet it is reality.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A few weeks back, Wanda asked me if he/she could come on the blog as a contributor. Knowing him/her from a past life, I agreed. Wanda then brought up the work he/she was doing on Christine O’Donnell. I reviewed it and said that it was fine to post so long as Wanda documented his/her claims. If he/she would do that, I’d stand behind it. And I’m confident that Wanda has met that burden, so I continue to support that effort 100%. Especially since no proof whatsoever has been offered to refute the documented claims in Wanda’s posts.

That said, those posts have unleashed a bout of nastiness unseen in my 30+ years in politics. What’s happened on the surface and behind the scenes is just not worth the hassle. So Wanda has broken off and started his/her own site at Delaware Republican Record, so that he/she may continue her revelations about the real Christine O’Donnell without bringing the wrath of the pathetic, no-life, bottom-dwellers on the rest of us. Also at the new site you can see several prominent Delaware bloggers confirm that Wanda is not Mike or myself, despite what has been alleged by the loser trolls of the blogosphere.

That’s all for now. Have fun with Wanda.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Rasmussen Update

by Dave Burris on August 6, 2010

Rasmussen Poll, hot off the presses:

Castle 49 (+2 from last month)
Coons 37 (+1)

Coons 46 (+5)
O’Donnell 36 (-3)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The Lord allowed me to drink some more
He said what I am searchin’ for are
The answers to all which are in front of me
The ultimate truth started to get blurry
For some strange reason it had to be
It was all a dream about Tennessee

-Tennessee, Arrested Development

Tennessee, a state in the middle of the GOP South, is showing Republicans the way today. In primary elections yesterday, GOP voters in Tennessee chose moderate Knoxville Mayor Bill Haslam to be their candidate for Governor over Rep. Zach Wamp and Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey.

Primary voters also chose state Sen. Diane Black over Lou Ann Zelenik, who made opposition to a Muslim Center a centerpiece of her campaign. She said that the Islamic Center “is not part of a religious movement; it is a political movement designed to fracture the moral and political foundation of Middle Tennessee.”

Finally, Sarah Palin-backed candidate CeCe Heil finished third in her primary.

And the rejection of extremism didn’t reside only on the right, Rep. Steve Cohen trounced former Memphis Mayor Willie Herenton, who made race a central part of his campaign, saying that the majority-black district needed a black Congressman.

If extremism can be rejected in Tennessee, surely it can be done here.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

American military dominance on land, sea, and air, has been a given since at least the end of the Cold War.  Indeed, a case can be made that the end of the Cold War was hastened by the widening gap separating our strategic and conventional capabilities from those of the USSR.

Since the end of the Cold War, we have lived in a uni-polar world.  One in which no nation, particularly in terms of conventional capabilities, can mount a credible challenge to us.   As such, we have seen the emergence of asymmetric challenges mounted by both state and non-state actors.  While often ingenious or novel, asymmetric threats are a sign of, and a reaction to, our overwhelming conventional superiority.  Moreover, counter-insurgency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the global Long War against Wahhabi inspired terrorism,  have re-oriented some of our defense policies and doctrine  away from traditional conventional  combat and towards more flexible forces better able to deal with missions in places like Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

In other words, we have shifted away from developing the heavy conventional weapons needed to fight an armored war in Central Europe and an air war against a well equipped and trained Soviet military.  This is reflected in our weapons systems procurement.  The cancellation of the Crusader program is an example, as is the decision to cease production of the F-22 Raptor.

However, lurking in the background, is the threat that a new near-peer competitor will emerge.  Of course, from one perspective, our dominance across a range of areas seems insurmountable.  Would any state really invest the resources necessary to develop weapons systems on par with our own in the air, on the ground, or at sea?  Building aircraft carriers, for example, those penultimate symbols of American military might, and then training crews to actually operate them, would be an extremely costly endeavor- and one with a long time horizon.  Indeed, the time horizon separating the emergence of the potential threat and the threat reaching full operational maturity probably spans more then a decade. [click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Slandered By A Whack Job

by Dave Burris on August 5, 2010

For the record, no one on this blog has received or expects to receive any compensation, financial or otherwise, from Mike Castle, the Castle Campaign or the Republican Party or any division thereof. We were not asked to intervene in this case, and we will not accept payment for writing on this blog.

The claim that we are being compensated was made today on the Rick Jensen show by credibility-free blowhard and O’Donnell minion Evan Quietsch, who immediately upon being challenged for proof admitted he had none.

No, Evan, the only people with proof in this situation is us. All you have is conspiracy theories, wild accusations with no proof and more “attack the messenger” politics. And trying to bring Stafford’s employer into the conversation is the worst kind of awful there is. He didn’t even have anything to do with Wanda’s post. Should we start talking about your employer & what you do for a living?

Memo to Christine: your hangers-on and staff members continue to make this situation worse for you. I was planning to move on to other things (to the extreme dismay of Miss Wanda), but being personally attacked today has changed my mind.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Guest post by Michael Fleming:

Scout Oath

On my honor, I will do my best
To do my duty to God and my country;
To obey the Scout Law;
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally straight.

  

When the British General and Boer War hero Robert Baden-Powell essentially invented the idea of scouting in 1907, he could never have predicted the lasting impact his conception would have on his American cousins across the pond.  Like many English institutions – well, perhaps with the exception of tea, scones and polite cabbies – in typical fashion, the good ole’ US of A seized on the idea, and took it to the next level.

Indeed, three years later a trio of American idealists led by a Chicago publisher joined forces to incorporate the Boy Scouts of America, bringing together several nascent scouting organizations into one new entity focused on service, character development and community leadership.

One hundred and fourteen million scouts later, the Boy Scouts of America are celebrating their Centennial.

This past weekend, the New York Timesfound the Boy Scout’s big anniversary to be an opportune moment for a snarky article headlined: “At Boy Scouts, A Call to Find the Way Back to Relevance.”   The sub-head was even more dismissive: “Facing Challenges, Group Redefines Itself.”

(Quick aside: The Times’ condescension calls to mind Bobby Kennedy’s famous quip that Time’seditors’ idea of a perfect story was, “More Nuns Leave Church.”  Further aside: This piece was reported by Katharine Q. “Kit” Seelye.  The flip, negative tone isn’t surprising.  I well remember Ms. Seelye coming to Delaware back in 1994 to cover the Roth-Oberly Senate race and doing so in a similarly cutting fashion.)

The article went on to paint a very dim picture of the BSA’s current state, cataloguing its “plunge” in membership since its 1973 high.  According to the Times,

The declines reflect the difficulties of keeping up with changing times and shifting demographics, as well as battling a perception that the organization is exclusionary…

The article’s less-than-positive characterization caught my eye – and ire – because, after a three-decade hiatus, I recently become re-acquainted with scouting through the enthusiastic engagement of my youngest child, a nine-year-old boy.  That exposure has been nothing but terrific for both father and son, I might add, leaving me convinced that scouting is in anything but a “decline.” [click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

It depends upon what the meaning of the word is is. If the if he-if is means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement.

The Federal Tax Lien

On June 28, 2010, candidate for US Senate Christine O’Donnell was on WDEL with Rick Jensen. During that interview she was asked about a Federal Tax Lien. She called the lien, “Thug politics at it worst…” and said, “There wasn’t even a tax lien.” This is that tax lien:

The lien was for the 2005 tax year and first assessed in 2006.

The tax lien was for the tax year 2005 and the first date of assessment was May of 2006, which was 2 years before she ran against Joe Biden for the Senate and 4 years before her bid against Mike Castle.

The lien was released in May of 2010. It is unclear whether Christine O’Donnell paid off the tax lien or whether it was dismissed.

The Mortgage Foreclosure

In March of this year Christine O’Donnell was interviewed by the News Journal and asked about “mortgage claims” on her Lincoln Street home. O’Donnell, “chalked up the mortgage mess to a technical error by the bank.” This is the initial filing by her mortgage lender:

The court filing by Christine O’Donnell’s mortgage company shows that O’Donnell stopped paying her mortgage in October of 2007, and her lender filed suit against her in March of 2008.

This is the subsequent May 13, 2008 filing by Christine O’Donnell’s mortgage company:

The May 2008 filing by O'Donnell's mortgage company shows she never responded to the suit.

The document shows that as of May, 2008, Chistine O’Donnell still had not made a mortgage payment, and was delinquent from October 2007.

The document also states that Christine O’Donnell, “failed to appear, plead or otherwise defend” which means that O’Donnell simply did not even respond the court notices she was receiving and the mortgage company directed the court to “enter Judgment by Default”. The word “FORECLOSURE” appears on page 2, where Christine O’Donnell’s mortgage company is asking for reimbursement for “FORECLOSURE COSTS” in the amount of $543.00.

In an interview less than a week ago with Byron York from the Washington Times Christine O’Donnell called the claims that she sold her house while it was in foreclosure “a flat out lie.”

However, the mortgage company filing not only shows that her house was in foreclosure, it shows that Christine O’Donnell was not paying her mortgage and would not “appear, plead or otherwise defend” herself against the mortgage company filing.

As of this posting, the tax lien and the mortgage foreclosure are apparently satisfied.

One more point: It is clear that Ginger Gibson’s March 2010 News Journal expose about Christine O’Donnell was correct and accurate. The News Journal generally makes my skin crawl, but that needed to be said.

UPDATE: And if there was any little shred of doubt, take a look at this beauty:

That document above shows the history of Christine O’Donnell’s mortgage FORECLOSURE.

Notice at the bottom, under the date 4/1/2008, you can see that Christine O’Donnell was “Served personally on 3-25-2008″ by the Sheriff.

And this should put Christine O’Donnell’s false claim that the house was not in foreclosure when she sold it to rest. On 6-4-2008 a judgment of foreclosure was issued against her by the Superior Court of New Castle County.

The last entry on her case history states, LEV FAC RET’D – SHERIFF SALE 8/12/08 STAYED PER WHITTINGTON AND AULGUR

Which means that Christine O’Donnell’s house WAS IN FORECLOSURE, and the mortgage company’s attorney “STAYED” THE SHERIFF’S SALE.

Yet, less than one week ago, Christine O’Donnell told Byron York from the Washington Times that the claim she sold her house while it was in foreclosure was “a flat out lie.”

Game. Set. Match.

Read more about Christine O’Donnell at DelawareTomorrow.com:

Christine O’Donnell: How to Live on Less than $13.00 a Day
Christine O’Donnell: Why Are We Learning the Truth Now?
Comment Rescue: Home Sweet HQ
Is Christine O’Donnell’s “Home Office” a Violation of Campaign Finance Law?
Tossing Your Money Down the Christine O’Donnell Money Pit
Who Will Christine O’Donnell Represent?
Christine Relates a Zany Yarn
Christine O’Donnell: The Rules Don’t Apply to Me

{ Comments on this entry are closed }